home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Columbia Kermit / kermit.zip / newsgroups / misc.20020314-20021006 / 000062_not-a-real-address@usa.net_Mon Apr 29 09:43:44 EDT 2002.msg < prev    next >
Text File  |  2020-01-01  |  2KB  |  39 lines
  1. Article: 13353 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  2. Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!phl-feed.news.verio.net!iad-feed.news.verio.net!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!newsfeed.nyc.globix.net!newsfeed.sjc.globix.net!cyclone-sf.pbi.net!199.106.71.17!pln-w!spln!dex!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews1
  3. From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net>
  4. Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  5. Subject: option presentation
  6. Date: 29 Apr 2002 08:47:49 GMT
  7. Organization: earthfriends
  8. Lines: 19
  9. Message-ID: <aaj1bl01a1m@enews1.newsguy.com>
  10. References: <3CAFF81C.8039CBF8@yk.rim.or.jp> <3CC98FC0.AADA5130@yk.rim.or.jp>
  11.  <aac6cv$rlm$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> <3CCA03A1.59EF10C9@yk.rim.or.jp>
  12.  <aaedmj$oo5$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu>
  13. NNTP-Posting-Host: p-618.newsdawg.com
  14. Mime-Version: 1.0
  15. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  16. User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp,
  17.  i686-redhat-linux)
  18. Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13353
  19.  
  20. <aaedmj$oo5$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> divulged:
  21. >In article <3CCA03A1.59EF10C9@yk.rim.or.jp>,
  22. >Ishikawa  <ishikawa@yk.rim.or.jp> wrote:
  23.  
  24. >: I noticed a few cases where an accepted option is not shown in the
  25. >: response to "?" completion helper listing.  The above is such a case.
  26. >: I found the effect of "minimal" and "none" is slightly
  27. >: different and so "none" ought to be listed IMHO.
  28. >: 
  29. >I made it "invisible" because it is dangerous in most situations, but in 
  30. >honor of your thorough investigations, maybe I can make it visible in
  31. >the next release (but it will still be dangerous).
  32.  
  33. perhaps there should be a user expertise level setting, that would present
  34. such options when sufficient, but which would default so that the display
  35. would be as today.
  36.  
  37. -- 
  38. bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
  39.